4.5 Article

Uncovering latent profiles of internet, smartphone and gaming use among young adults and their relationships with psychosocial risk factors

Journal

BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2023.2295955

Keywords

Problematic internet users; problematic gamers; gaming; smartphone; distress

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined problematic internet use behaviors among internet users aged 18-24 and identified a small subgroup that may need tailored intervention to improve their psychological well-being.
The present study examined internet users aged 18-24 years based on their generalised (i.e. internet and smartphone) and specific (i.e. gaming, frequency of gaming, time spent in video game sessions) problematic internet use behaviours, and their relations with sociodemographic variables and psychosocial risk factors. The sample included 851 Italian young adults (51.9% females; Mage = 21.62 +/- 1.58 years). Five different profiles of young adults characterised by unique patterns of generalised and specific problematic internet use were identified through the latent profile analysis (LPA): (1) non-problematic internet users, (2) normative internet and gaming users, (3) non-problematic gamers, (4) problematic internet users, and (5) problematic gamers. Significant differences were observed among profiles on several auxiliary variables, with problematic internet users and problematic gamers displaying higher levels of psychological distress, emotion dysregulation, dissociative experiences, attachment insecurity and loneliness, as well as lower levels of satisfaction of basic psychological needs, self-esteem, and perceived social support. The study findings support the view that a relatively small subgroup of internet users may need tailored intervention to reduce their maladaptive use of internet services and improve their psychological well-being.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available