Journal
ETHOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eth.13427
Keywords
by-product mutualism; cooperation; fish; predator inspection; reciprocity; tit-for-tat
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Cooperative behaviors are widespread in the animal kingdom, but their evolution is complex. Reciprocity, such as cooperating with previous partners, has been suggested as the foundation of cooperation. Cooperative predator inspection, where individuals approach potential threats, has been considered a textbook example of reciprocity. However, some scholars have questioned whether it is truly cooperative or a by-product of selfish behavior. New tools and approaches are needed to resolve this debate.
Cooperative behaviours, which benefit a recipient, are widespread in the animal kingdom; yet their evolution is not straightforward. Reciprocity, i.e., cooperating with previously experienced cooperative partners, has been suggested to underly cooperation, but has been contested throughout the years. Once a textbook example of reciprocity was cooperative predator inspection, where one or several individuals leave their group to approach a potential threat. Each can at any point stop or retreat, increasing the risk for its partner. It was suggested that inspecting individuals follow a specific reciprocal strategy called tit-for-tat, i.e., cooperating on the first move and then copying the partner's last move. Numerous studies provide evidence to support the claim that fish cooperate to inspect predators, including three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus), guppies (Poecilia reticulata) and minnows (Phoxinus phoxinus). However, over the past few decades some scholars have expressed scepticism whether predator inspection is indeed a cooperative behaviour or rather a case of by-product mutualism, which describes behaviours that benefit a partner as a corollary of an otherwise selfish behaviour. For instance, it has been shown that pairs of fish moving in unfamiliar environments appear to coordinate movements even in the absence of predators. Many studies have also used coarse measures of overall approach rates towards predators rather than the fine-grained analyses necessary to infer tit-for-tat in cooperative inspections. Now is the time to return to the question of cooperative predator inspection with new tools and approaches to resolve a decades-old debate. Schematic representation of a typical coordinated predator inspection event. The numbers show order (left-to-right and top to bottom). The larger fish in the top left corner of each panel represents a potential predator, the smaller fish represent prey fish. Fish silhouettes designs from PhyloPic.image
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available