4.8 Article

Selective Etching of Metal-Organic Frameworks for Open Porous Structures: Mass-Efficient Catalysts with Enhanced Oxygen Reduction Reaction for Fuel Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 145, Issue 50, Pages 27262-27272

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c05544

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a method for constructing an open-pore structure in metal-organic frameworks through chelation-assisted selective etching, resulting in atomically dispersed Fe atoms anchored on a carbon framework. The open-pore structure reduces oxygen transport resistance, demonstrating excellent oxygen reduction reaction activity and stability.
Fe-N-x-C-based single-atom (SA-Fe-N-C) catalysts have shown favorable oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity. However, their application in proton exchange membrane fuel cells is hindered by reduced performance owing to the thick catalyst layer, restricting mass transfer and the O-2 supply. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a promising class of crystal materials, but their narrow pores exacerbate the sluggish mass-transport properties within the catalyst layer. This study developed an approach for constructing an open-pore structure in MOFs via chelation-assisted selective etching, resulting in atomically dispersed Fe atoms anchored on an N, S co-doped carbon framework. The open-pore structure reduces oxygen transport resistance in the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) with unprecedented ORR activity and stability, as evidenced by finite element simulations. In an acidic electrolyte, the OP-Fe-NC catalyst shows a half-wave potential of 0.89 V vs RHE, surpassing Pt/C by 20 mV, and a current density of 29 mA cm(-2) at 0.9 ViR-free in the MEA. This study provides an effective structural strategy for fabricating electrocatalysts with high mass efficiency and atomic precision for energy storage and conversion devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available