4.6 Article

Hybridization between salt resistant and salt susceptible genotypes of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) and purity testing of the hybrids using SSRs markers

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 521-527

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61161-3

Keywords

mungbean; salinity stress; breeding; hybrid purity; improved characteristics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Six cultivated and two wild genotypes of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) possessing variation for phenotypic and genotypic response for salt tolerance were hybridized. Hybridization results showed successful pod set and significant variations in cross-compatibility of investigated genotypes. Genotypes PLM 380 and PLM 562 showed promising combining ability with all genotypes. Results revealed significant crossing compatibility between V. radiata and V. sublobata. The cross ability ranged from 1.99 to 5.12% (average 3.08%). Molecular analysis confirmed the hybrids purity. All F-1 seeds were bold, green/shiny green and germinated between 3 to 5 days. Hybrid plants were normal, fertile and healthier over their respective progenitors. Uniform flowering and maturity of the hybrids showed absence of any defect or alteration in plant habit and life cycle of the hybrids. The hybrid plants showed increase in yield characteristics as no. of pods, pod length, 100 seeds weight, and yield per plant. Number of pods containing F-2 seeds ranged from 5-8 per cluster. The F-2 seeds were collected and stored for further research. Present study suggests that salt resistant wild relatives or cultivars of mungbean can be explored by breeding as a source of useful traits/genes providing salt tolerance. This may help in development of best mungbean variety for saline prone areas. Micro-satellite markers linked to the trait/genes may assist breeding by early selection of the genotypes compared to the phenotypic screening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available