4.4 Review

Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Atypical EGFR Mutations

Journal

CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01159-z

Keywords

Atypical EGFR; Uncommon EGFR; NSCLC; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are the first-line treatment for NSCLC with atypical EGFR mutations. The choice of TKI depends on the specific mutation, with afatinib being the FDA-approved option for atypical EGFR mutations. Dacomitinib can also be considered, while osimertinib is recommended for classical-like mutations such as L861Q. Comprehensive sequencing is crucial for identifying these mutations.
EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) should always be considered when treating advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with atypical EGFR mutations. The first choice of TKI depends on the specific mutation(s) present and its effect on structure and function of the EGFR protein. Afatinib is the only EGFR TKI currently FDA approved for atypical EGFR mutations and has the strongest data to support its use in PACC mutations, a subgroup of atypical EGFR mutations which includes G719X and S7681. Dacomitinib may also be an option for these mutations given similar efficacy to afatinib. In contrast, for classical-like mutations such as L861Q, osimertinib should be considered the first choice given that their behavior mimics that of the classical mutations exon 19 deletion and L858R. Osimertinib should also be utilized in the setting of a concurrent T790M mutation. Superior CNS penetrance and well managed toxicity profile may also be reasons to consider osimertinib. Given that the choice of TKI may depend on the specific mutation, it is crucial that every patient diagnosed with NSCLC undergo comprehensive sequencing to identify these mutations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available