3.8 Article

The degenerate spouse: Eugenics and divorce in Arabella Kenealy's The Marriage Yoke (1904) and Gabriele Reuter's 'Eines Toten Wiederkehr' (1901)

Journal

ORBIS LITTERARUM
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/oli.12432

Keywords

Arabella Kenealy; divorce; eugenics; Gabriele Reuter; second marriages; syphilis plot; women writers

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, eugenics advocated for human intervention to correct the perceived distortion of the 'natural' evolutionary progress. This article discusses how this idea is portrayed in two novels, highlighting the tragedy of marrying a 'defective' partner and the burden it places on the healthy individuals.
During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, eugenics emphasised human intervention to rectify a perceived distortion of the 'natural' evolutionary progress. One of the interventions advocated by eugenicists was the prevention of marriages that were deemed incompatible. The union between the 'fit' and the 'unfit' was constantly propagated as the reason behind the degeneration of the race, especially in the wake of the rediscovery of Mendel's theories on heredity and the repudiation of Lamarckism. Both Arabella Kenealy's The Marriage Yoke (1904) and Gabriela Reuter's 'Eines Toten Wiederkehr' (1908) portray the tragedy of such a marriage to a 'defective' partner. Moreover, they emphasise the lost potential of this marriage, both for the individual and the nation, by also introducing healthier characters with whom a better eugenic match could have been made. Instead, the healthy partners are burdened by the care and nursing of their mentally and physically defective partners and children. In this article I will not only show how scientific discourses are echoed and mediated within the narrative, but also how they are used to advocate for social change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available