4.1 Article

Not a Fairy Tale at All! Examining the Factors Underlying the Myths About Domestic Violence Among Romanian, Highly Educated Adults

Journal

DEVIANT BEHAVIOR
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2293104

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The myths about domestic violence refer to false beliefs that aim to downplay, deny, or justify aggression. This research examined the factors underlying these myths using a socio-cognitive perspective. The study found that moral disengagement was the only predictor for acceptance of the myths in the male sample, while hostile sexism was the strongest predictor in the female sample. These results highlight the importance of examining personal and cultural factors when considering beliefs about domestic violence.
The myths about domestic violence refer to the false, stereotypical beliefs aimed to minimize, deny, or justify the aggression. The present research explored the factors underlying the myths about domestic violence using a socio-cognitive perspective. In a sample of 364 Romanian adults with a university degree, aged 19 to 75 (M = 36.46, SD = 10.97, 79.9% females), we explored how sexism, patriarchal beliefs, moral disengagement, and the Dark Triad traits might predict participants' views on domestic violence. Regression analyses suggested that, in the male sample, the only predictor for the acceptance of the myths regarding domestic violence was moral disengagement, and the model accounted for more than 50% of the variance of the dependent variable. In the female sample, the strongest predictor was hostile sexism, and the model accounted for more than 40% of the variance of the acceptance of the myths regarding domestic violence. We discuss our results focusing on the practical implications of people's beliefs about domestic violence and the importance of examining the underlying personal and cultural factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available