Journal
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 303, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113802
Keywords
Energy sharing; Distributed photovoltaic; Building cluster; Dual-layer optimization; Collaborative benefits
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study proposes a dual-layer optimization design method to maximize the energy sharing potential, enhance collaborative benefits, and reduce the storage capacity of building clusters. Case studies show that the proposed design significantly improves the performance of building clusters, reduces energy storage capacity, and shortens the payback period.
Renewable energy sharing effectively enhances the collaborative benefits of building clusters. Distributed photovoltaic (PV) generation is the most widely applied renewable energy method for building clusters due to its high space utilization and broad applicability. However, the majority of building cluster planning and energy storage system designs tend to neglect the impact of energy sharing potential, thereby leading to limited im-provements in cluster-level benefits and oversized storage capacity. Therefore, we propose a dual-layer opti-mization design method to maximize the energy sharing potential, enhance collaborative benefits, and reduce the storage capacity of building clusters. Firstly, the building cluster is randomly divided into Clustered Building Groups (CBGs). Secondly, linear programming (LP) is applied in the under-layer to optimize the shared energy storage capacity for each CBG. Finally, the upper-layer utilizes NSGA-II and TOPSIS to identify the optimal grouping scheme. Case studies on a building cluster showed that compared with two existing design methods, the proposed design could maximize the energy sharing potential, significantly improve the building cluster's per-formance, and reduce the energy storage capacity. Specifically, it achieved the highest TOPSIS score of 0.673, reduced the electricity purchase cost by 4.6 %, increased PV self-consumption by 15.4 %, reduced the storage capacity by 17.4 %, and shortened the payback period from 9.31 years to 4.33 years. These results suggest that employing similar procedures can be advantageous in achieving energy autonomy for building clusters.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available