4.7 Article

Determination of soil water retention curves from thermal conductivity curves, texture, bulk density, and field capacity

Journal

SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
Volume 237, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2023.105957

Keywords

Soil water retention curve; Van Genuchten model; Soil thermal conductivity; Field capacity; Bulk density; Soil texture

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new approach is presented in this study to estimate the parameters of the soil water retention curve (SWRC). The new method accurately estimates SWRCs by using measured thermal conductivity-water content curves, soil texture, bulk density, and field capacity water content.
The soil water retention curve (SWRC) is frequently expressed using the van Genuchten (VG) model, which has four parameters: saturated water content (theta s), residual water content (theta r), alpha, and m (1-1/n). Soil thermal conductivity (lambda), which is linked to the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soil, has been a proxy variable used to estimate SWRC. In this study, we present a new approach to estimate the VG model parameters. Parameters theta s, alpha and m are calculated from the information of soil texture, bulk density (rho b), and a measured water content at field capacity (theta fc, at -33 kPa or -10 kPa), and theta r is estimated from the thermal conductivity versus water content curve, lambda(theta), based on similarities between SWRCs and lambda(theta) curves. The new approach was evaluated with laboratory and field measurements on 23 soils of various textures, rho b values, and theta values. Results showed that for repacked core samples, intact core samples, and in situ field soils, the new approach estimated SWRCs with average root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 0.042, 0.030, and 0.049 m3 m-3, respectively. The new approach offers a quick and effective way to estimate SWRCs accurately with measured lambda(theta) curves, texture, bulk density, and theta at field capacity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available