4.7 Article

Study on the dynamic characteristics of pile wharves subjected to underwater explosion

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 291, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116406

Keywords

Pile wharf; Underwater explosion; Scaling test; Numerical simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the dynamic response characteristics and damage modes of pile wharves subjected to underwater explosions. The results showed that the main damaged components of the pile wharf were the piles, and inclined piles had a higher probability of moderate or more significant damage compared to vertical piles. The study also suggested that replacing inclined piles with alternative optimized structures benefits the blast resistance of pile wharves.
A test was conducted to investigate the dynamic response characteristics and damage modes of pile wharves subjected to underwater explosions. To simulate the explosion process, a fluid-solid coupling finite element model of the pile wharf was constructed. The structural damage process, response characteristics, and failure modes of the pile wharf were analyzed based on the experimental and numerical simulation results. The results showed that the main damaged components of the pile wharf were the piles, with damage modes of cracks, spalling, and brittle shear. The probability of moderate or more significant damage to the inclined piles was 25% higher than that of the vertical piles. The inclined piles with low deformation ability were more prone to local concrete brittle failure, significantly increasing the possibility of instability and failure of the pile wharf structure. The acceleration response spectrum indicated that although the structure of the pile wharf was severely damaged, the personnel on its surface slab still had a high probability of survival. The study indicates that replacing inclined piles with alternative optimized structures benefits the blast resistance of pile wharves.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available