4.7 Article

Fractionation of neural reward processing into independent components by novel decoding principle

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 284, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120463

Keywords

Reward/punishment anticipation; Orthogonal decoding; Task fMRI; Evaluation; Salience

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How to retrieve latent neurobehavioural processes from complex neurobiological signals is a challenge that has not been fully addressed. This study presents a novel approach, DeCoP, that outperforms traditional decoding methods in terms of false inference and robustness. The research reveals distinct evaluation and readiness processes during reward/punishment anticipation, modulated by different dopamine systems. Only a few brain regions encode exact input information, while others encode abstract information.
How to retrieve latent neurobehavioural processes from complex neurobiological signals is an important yet unresolved challenge. Here, we develop a novel approach, orthogonal-Decoding multi-Cognitive Processes (DeCoP), to reveal underlying latent neurobehavioural processing and show that its performance is superior to traditional non-orthogonal decoding in terms of both false inference and robustness. Processing value and salience information are two fundamental but mutually confounded pathways of reward reinforcement essential for decision making. During reward/punishment anticipation, we applied DeCoP to decode brain-wide responses into spatially overlapping, yet functionally independent, evaluation and readiness processes, which are modulated differentially by meso-limbic vs nigro-striatal dopamine systems. Using DeCoP, we further demonstrated that most brain regions only encoded abstract information but not the exact input, except for dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and insula. Furthermore, we anticipate our novel analytical principle to be applied generally in decoding multiple latent neurobehavioral processes and thus advance both the design and hypothesis testing for cognitive tasks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available