4.7 Review

A review of UAV integration in forensic civil engineering: From sensor technologies to geotechnical, structural and water infrastructure applications

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 224, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113886

Keywords

Forensic engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Sensors; Structural engineering; Unmanned aerial vehicle; Water infrastructure engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews the categorization and applications of UAV sensors in forensic engineering, with a focus on geotechnical, structural, and water infrastructure fields. It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of sensors with different wavelengths and addresses the challenges of current UAV technology and recommendations for further research in forensic engineering.
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) mounted with remote sensors have been widely used in architectural, civil, and environmental engineering fields. In particular, UAVs are applied for monitoring civil infrastructure to analyze the cause of failure in forensic engineering. This paper reviews UAV sensors and their applications in the context of forensic engineering. First, RGB, non-RGB cameras (e.g., IR thermal, multispectral, and hyperspectral detectors), and non-imaging sensors (e.g., LiDAR and SAR) are categorized by their emission methods. The advantages and disadvantages of sensors with different wavelengths, such as penetration capability and resolution, are described. Thereafter, application cases are individually presented in the geotechnical, structural, and water infrastructure fields. Different failures in each field are described: geotechnical engineering (slope failure, ground deformation), structural engineering (the stability, durability of infrastructure), water infrastructure engineering (harmful algal blooms, oil spill). Finally, the challenges of current UAV technology and recom-mendations for further study in forensic engineering are addressed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available