4.7 Article

Automatic detection and pixel-level quantification of surface microcracks in ceramics grinding: An exploration with Mask R-CNN and TransUNet

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 224, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113895

Keywords

Ceramics grinding; Surface microcracks; Mask R-CNN; TransUNet; Crack quantification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An automatic detection and pixel-level quantification model based on joint Mask R-CNN and TransUNet is developed to accurately evaluate microcrack damage on the grinding surfaces of engineering ceramics. The model is effectively trained on actual micrograph image dataset using a joint training strategy. The proposed model achieves reliable automatic detection and fine segmentation of microcracks, and a skeleton-based quantification model is also proposed to provide comprehensive and precise measurements of microcrack size.
Microcrack damage on the grinding surfaces of engineering ceramics is inevitably incurred. To accurately evaluate the microcrack damage, an automatic detection and pixel-level quantification model based on the joint Mask R-CNN and TransUNet is developed. In addition, a joint training strategy is employed and the model is trained effectively on the image dataset of microcrack damage derived from the Si3N4 grinding, as captured by SEM. The Mask R-CNN demonstrates reliable automatic detection of microcracks, achieving an Average Precision of AP50 = 0.989 and AP75 = 0.864. Meanwhile, the TransUNet achieves fine segmentation of microcracks with complex characteristics, with an F1 score of 0.914 and an IoU value of 0.785. A skeleton-based quantification model of microcrack size is proposed, which delivers comprehensive and precise measurements of area, length, and notably, the width. The proposed quantification model provides a technical reference for the automatic evaluation of grinding surface quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available