Journal
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 350, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119637
Keywords
Dairy production; Outdoor yards; Stand-off pad; Filtrating materials; Aeration; Contaminant removal
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study evaluated the effect of alternative filtering materials and bed aeration on the retention of nutrients and fecal bacteria in woodchip bedded stand-off pads for cows. The results showed that the alternative biofilters were more efficient in removing COD, SS, TN, and NO3-N, while conventional biofilters were more efficient for PO4-P removal. Aeration did not have a significant effect under the tested temperature conditions.
Woodchips in stand-off pads for wintering cows have been applied in countries like Ireland and New Zealand. Their primary role is to protect soils by effectively filtering nutrients during wet conditions, while ensuring a healthy and comfortable environment for the cows. The stand-off pad concept has the potential to be adopted in Canada to provide year-long outdoor access to tie-stall dairy cows. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of alternative filtering materials and bed aeration under controlled laboratory conditions. Twelve biofilter columns (0.3 m in diameter and 1-m high) were installed in 12 environmentally-controlled chambers (1.2-m wide by 2.4-m long), and divided into four treatments: a bed of conventional woodchips or an alternative mix of organic materials (sphagnum peat moss, woodchips and biochar) with and without aeration (flux rate set at 0.6 m3/min/m2). Approximately 0.6 L of semi-synthetic dairy manure and 1 L of tap water were poured on the biofilters during two experimental periods of 4 weeks, simulating the effect of either winter or summer conditions (room temperature below or over 10 degrees C) on the retention of nutrients and fecal bacteria. Results showed that the alternative biofilters under both summer and winter conditions were more efficient in removing COD, SS, TN, and NO3-N than conventional biofilters (maximum efficiencies of 97.6%, 99.7%, 96.4%, and 98.4%, respectively). Similarly for E. coli, they achieved a minimum concentration of 1.8 Log10 CFU/100 ml. Conventional biofilters were more efficient for PO4-P removal with a maximum efficiency of 88.2%. Aeration did not have any significant effect under the tested temperature conditions. Additional factors such as media adaptation time as well as aeration flow during this period should be considered.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available