4.7 Article

Online and offline cooperation promotion mechanism in the E-waste recycling industry

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107337

Keywords

E -waste; Corporate environmental responsibility; Online and offline cooperation; Government regulation; Prospective loss; Evolutionary game

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the cooperation between online recyclers and offline formal disposing enterprises in the e-waste recycling industry and emphasizes the importance of government regulations. The study reveals the threshold for the ratio of cooperation costs to excess benefits and the effect of government subsidies and penalties. These findings provide guidance for governments in promoting cooperation between these two types of enterprises.
This paper considers environment management in a new context. In the e-waste recycling industry, most e-waste is irresponsibly recycled and disposed of by informal enterprises, causing serious secondary pollution. Cooperation between emerging online recyclers and offline formal disposing enterprises can help reduce secondary pollution and improve the efficiency of resource reuse to achieve co-benefits, but they operate at a cost disadvantage compared with informal enterprises, which results in a weak motivation for cooperation. Reasonable government regulations are critical to the cooperation between these two types of enterprises. Existing research lacks attention to this. We develop evolutionary game models under a market mechanism and under government regulation to study the influence of multiple factors, including the impact of the prospective loss on the strategies evolution of the game players. We also analyze the effect of government regulation when the market mechanism fails. The results show that: (1) there is a threshold for the ratio of cooperation costs to the excess benefits obtained from cooperation (i.e., between 0.31 and 0.35). When the ratio is greater than the threshold value, the market mechanism fails, and the enterprises' behavior evolves towards non-cooperation. (2) Compared with earnings, enterprises are more sensitive to the prospective loss. Therefore, the government should provide subsidies that help reduce the cost for enterprises to cooperate, and penalize enterprises failing to cooperate. (3) There is a threshold effect in government subsidies and penalties (thresholds between 0.25 and 0.3 and 0.3-0.4, respectively). Only when exceeding the threshold, can they be effective. However, excessive subsidies and penalties also have limitations, and moderate subsidies and penalties can effectively promote the cooperation between the two types of enterprises. Our findings clarify the conditions under which the government can promote online and offline cooperation on e-waste recycling. These insights can also offer a reference for other countries and industries facing similar challenges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available