4.6 Review

A deep-learning real-time bias correction method for significant wave height forecasts in the Western North Pacific

Journal

OCEAN MODELLING
Volume 187, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2023.102289

Keywords

Bias correction; Significant wave height; Deep learning; Loss function; Spatiotemporal learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study employed a spatiotemporal deep-learning method to correct biases in numerical ocean wave forecasts. By using a correction model driven by both wave and wind fields and a novel pixel-switch loss function, the corrected results performed well in different seasons and improved the accuracy of the original forecasts.
Significant wave height (SWH) is one of the most important parameters characterizing ocean waves, and accurate numerical ocean wave forecasting is crucial for coastal protection and shipping. However, due to the randomness and nonlinearity of the wind fields that generate ocean waves and the complex interaction between wave and wind fields, current forecasts of numerical ocean waves have biases. In this study, a spatiotemporal deep-learning method was employed to correct gridded SWH forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting System Integrated Forecast System Global Model (ECMWF-IFS). This method was built on the trajectory gated recurrent unit deep neural network, and it conducts real-time rolling correction for the 0-240-h SWH forecasts from ECMWF-IFS. The correction model is co-driven by wave and wind fields, providing better results than those based on wave fields alone. A novel pixel-switch loss function was developed. The pixel-switch loss function can dynamically fine-tune the pre-trained correction model, focusing on pixels with large biases in SWH forecasts. According to the seasonal characteristics of SWH, four correction models were constructed separately, for spring, summer, autumn, and winter. The experimental results show that, compared with the original ECMWF SWH predictions, the correction was most effective in spring, when the mean absolute error decreased by 12.972-46.237%. Although winter had the worst performance, the mean absolute error decreased by 13.794-38.953%. The corrected results improved the original ECMWF SWH forecasts under both normal and extreme weather conditions, indicating that our SWH correction model is robust and generalizable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available