4.2 Article

Spiral-Elliptical automated galaxy morphology classification from telescope images

Journal

ASTRONOMY AND COMPUTING
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ascom.2023.100770

Keywords

Classification; Elliptical galaxy; Galaxy morphology; Machine learning; Random forest; Spiral galaxy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The classification of galaxy morphologies is important for studying hierarchical structure formation theories. Traditional manual visual classification cannot cope with the large influx of data, leading to the proposal of crowdsourced visual classification and automated computational methods. This study develops two novel galaxy morphology statistics and simplifies existing image statistics, demonstrating their accuracy and effectiveness.
The classification of galaxy morphologies is an important step in the investigation of theories of hierarchical structure formation. While human expert visual classification remains quite effective and accurate, it cannot keep up with the massive influx of data from emerging sky surveys. A variety of approaches have been proposed to classify large numbers of galaxies; these approaches include crowdsourced visual classification, and automated and computational methods, such as machine learning methods based on designed morphology statistics and deep learning. In this work, we develop two novel galaxy morphology statistics, descent average and descent variance, which can be efficiently extracted from telescope galaxy images. We further propose simplified versions of the existing image statistics concentration, asymmetry, and clumpiness, which have been widely used in the literature of galaxy morphologies. We utilize the galaxy image data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey to demonstrate the effective performance of our proposed image statistics at accurately detecting spiral and elliptical galaxies when used as features of a random forest classifier.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available