4.3 Article

Evaluating the efficacy of hydrogen peroxide vapor against a retroviral vector in a gene therapy manufacturing facility

Journal

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/lambio/ovac014

Keywords

hydrogen peroxide; gene therapy; viral vector; retrovirus; decontamination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficacy of 35% hydrogen peroxide vapor (HPV) against a novel Simian Immunodeficiency retrovirus (SIV) was evaluated in a 624m(3) GMP grade C manufacturing facility. SIV biological indicators were produced on-site with an average titre of 7.11x10(8) TU/mL and were distributed around the facility. The study found that HPV was effective in eliminating the SIV and commercial G. stearothermophilus biological indicators, providing a simple and robust method for biodecontamination of gene therapy facilities.
An evaluation of the efficacy of 35% hydrogen peroxide vapor (HPV) against a novel Simian Immunodeficiency retrovirus (SIV) was conducted in a 624m(3) GMP grade C manufacturing facility. SIV biological indicators, with an average titre of 7.11x10(8) TU/mL [equivalent to 1.3x10(8) Reverse transcriptase (RT) nanounits when analysed by F-PERT], were produced on-site using virus presented within an anticipated worst-case support matrix based on the manufacturers commercially confidential virus support media. SIV biological indicators were distributed around the manufacturing facility, including locations identified as key contamination control points by the manufacturer, and exposed to a HPV cycle. Commercially available biological indicators of 6 log(10)Geobacillus stearothermophilus were co-located with the SIV Biological Indicator (BIs). HPV was found to be efficacious in eliminating the SIV and commercial G. stearothermophilus BIs and offers a simple and robust method for biodecontamination of gene therapy facilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available