Journal
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 601-609Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04271-1
Keywords
Uro-oncologic surgery; Hospital rating websites; Survey; Decision making; Health services research
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the utilization of hospital rating websites (HRWs) among uro-oncological patients in Germany and found that HRWs had little impact on hospital choice decisions. Patients were more likely to rely on urologists' recommendations.
Purpose Hospital rating websites (HRW) offer decision support in hospital choice for patients. To investigate the impact of HRWs of uro-oncological patients undergoing elective surgery in Germany.Methods From 01/2020 to 04/2021, patients admitted for radical prostatectomy, radical cystectomy, or renal tumor surgery received a questionnaire on decision-making in hospital choice and the use of HRWs at 10 German urologic clinics.Results Our study includes n = 812 completed questionnaires (response rate 81.2%). The mean age was 65.2 & PLUSMN; 10.2 years; 16.5% were women. Patients were scheduled for prostatectomy in 49.1%, renal tumor surgery in 20.3%, and cystectomy in 13.5% (other 17.1%). Following sources of information influenced the decision process of hospital choice: urologists' recommendation (52.6%), previous experience in the hospital (20.3%), recommendations from social environment (17.6%), the hospital's website (10.8%) and 8.2% used other sources. Only 4.3% (n = 35) used a HRW for decision making. However, 29% changed their hospital choice due to the information provided HRW. The most frequently used platforms were Weisse-Liste.de (32%), the AOK-Krankenhausnavigator (13%) and Qualitaetskliniken.de (8%). On average, patients rated positively concerning satisfaction with the respective HRW on the Acceptability E-Scale (mean values of the individual items: 1.8-2.1).Conclusion In Germany, HRWs play a minor role for uro-oncologic patients undergoing elective surgery. Instead, personal consultation of the treating urologist seems to be far more important. Although patients predominantly rated the provided information of the HRW as positive, only a quarter of users changed the initial choice of hospital.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available