4.5 Article

Identifying optimal co-location calibration periods for low-cost sensors

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 169-179

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-16-169-2023

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-cost sensors are commonly used with reference instruments for calibration, but little attention has been given to optimizing the calibration period. This study investigated the optimal duration of co-location calibration for sensors measuring various pollutants. The results showed that the required calibration period varied for different sensor types and factors such as sensor response to environmental factors and cross-sensitivities to other pollutants influenced the duration.
Low-cost sensors are often co-located with reference instruments to assess their performance and establish calibration equations, but limited discussion has focused on whether the duration of this calibration period can be optimized. We placed a multipollutant monitor that contained sensors that measured particulate matter smaller than 2.5 mu m (PM2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O-3), and nitric oxide (NO) at a reference field site for 1 year. We developed calibration equations using randomly selected co-location subsets spanning 1 to 180 consecutive days out of the 1-year period and compared the potential root-mean-square error (RMSE) and Pearson correlation coefficient (r) values. The co-located calibration period required to obtain consistent results varied by sensor type, and several factors increased the co-location duration required for accurate calibration, including the response of a sensor to environmental factors, such as temperature or relative humidity (RH), or cross-sensitivities to other pollutants. Using measurements from Baltimore, MD, where a broad range of environmental conditions may be observed over a given year, we found diminishing improvements in the median RMSE for calibration periods longer than about 6 weeks for all the sensors. The best performing calibration periods were the ones that contained a range of environmental conditions similar to those encountered during the evaluation period (i.e., all other days of the year not used in the calibration). With optimal, varying conditions it was possible to obtain an accurate calibration in as little as 1 week for all sensors, suggesting that co-location can be minimized if the period is strategically selected and monitored so that the calibration period is representative of the desired measurement setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available