4.6 Review

Prognostic value of lymph node micrometastasis in esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1025855

Keywords

esophageal cancer; lymph node micrometastasis; prognosis; meta-analysis; systematic review

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognosis value of lymph node micrometastasis (LNM) in esophageal cancer patients. The results showed that LNM positivity worsens the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) of esophageal cancer patients, while no significant difference was observed in recurrence rates. These findings highlight the importance of considering LNM status in the prognosis and management of esophageal cancer.
Objective: Whether lymph node micrometastasis (LNM) increases the risk in esophageal cancer patients remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognosis value of LNM in esophageal cancer patients. Methods: Two reviewers independently searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for eligible citations until February 2022. We calculated pooled estimates of the hazards ratio with a random-effects model. The certainty of evidence was determined by the Grade of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test. We also performed subgroup analysis to explore the source of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 16 studies, with 1,652 patients, were included. The overall survival (OS) was significantly increased with LNM negativity compared with LNM positivity (HR 1.95; 95% CI, 1.53-2.49; P < 0.001; I-2 = 0.0%, P = 0.930; certainty of evidence: low). Relapse-free survival (RFS) was significantly increased with LNM negativity compared with LNM positivity (HR 3.39; 95% CI, 1.87-6.16; P < 0.001; I-2 = 50.18%, P = 0.060; certainty of evidence: moderate). No significant difference was observed in recurrence between the two groups (certainty of evidence: low). Sensitivity analysis revealed a stable trend. In addition, the funnel plot and Egger's test did not show significant publication bias. Conclusion: LNM positivity worsens the prognosis in esophageal cancer, and the evidence for RFS is moderate. Future relevant high-quality studies are warranted to validate our results further and provide a reference for guidelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available