4.7 Article

Tri-CNN: A Three Branch Model for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs15020316

Keywords

hyperspectral classification; Convolutional Neural Networks; deep learning; feature fusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel method called Tri-CNN and a three-branch feature fusion approach are proposed to address the issue of insufficient training samples in hyperspectral image (HSI) classification. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method exhibits remarkable performance in terms of overall accuracy (OA), average accuracy (AA), and Kappa metrics when compared to existing methods.
Hyperspectral Image (HSI) classification methods that use Deep Learning (DL) have proven to be effective in recent years. In particular, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have demonstrated extremely powerful performance in such tasks. However, the lack of training samples is one of the main contributors to low classification performance. Traditional CNN-based techniques under-utilize the inter-band correlations of HSI because they primarily use 2D-CNNs for feature extraction. Contrariwise, 3D-CNNs extract both spectral and spatial information using the same operation. While this overcomes the limitation of 2D-CNNs, it may lead to insufficient extraction of features. In order to overcome this issue, we propose an HSI classification approach named Tri-CNN which is based on a multi-scale 3D-CNN and three-branch feature fusion. We first extract HSI features using 3D-CNN at various scales. The three different features are then flattened and concatenated. To obtain the classification results, the fused features then traverse a number of fully connected layers and eventually a softmax layer. Experimental results are conducted on three datasets, Pavia University (PU), Salinas scene (SA) and GulfPort (GP) datasets, respectively. Classification results indicate that our proposed methodology shows remarkable performance in terms of the Overall Accuracy (OA), Average Accuracy (AA), and Kappa metrics when compared against existing methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available