4.2 Article

In Vitro Cytocompatibility Study of a Medical β-Type Ti-35.5Nb-5.7Ta Titanium Alloy

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 141-148

Publisher

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jbt.2016.1424

Keywords

beta-Type Titanium Alloy; Biomaterials; Cytotoxicity; Cell Attachment; HEK293T Cell; Alamar Blue Assay

Funding

  1. European Community's FP7-SME Programme [606112]
  2. EPSRC [EP/N007638/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N007638/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research was part of a European Commission funded research project for the development of a new generation of titanium based orthopaedic biomaterials. In particular, hip implants of a beta-type Ti-35.5Nb-5.7Ta alloy were fabricated by the powder metallurgy route. An advanced surface treatment technology of Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENS) was used to apply a ZrO2/Zr coating on the implant surfaces where relative movement takes place between the implant and the bone, in order to enhance the wear resistance. The present work was conducted to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the uncoated and ZrO2/Zr coated beta-type Ti-35.5Nb-5.7Ta alloy in both indirect and direct contact of human embryonic kidney 293T (HEK293T) cells. The cellular response was quantified by cell viability assessments using Alamar Blue assay and cell attachment. Cytotoxicity experiments showed that the responses of the uncoated and ZrO2/Zr coated alloy on surviving cells were nontoxic. HEK293T cells displayed appropriate survival rates, good cell adhesion and cell spreading. These results confirm that the beta-type Ti-35.5Nb-5.7Ta alloy, in both coated and uncoated conditions possesses good cytocompatibility, which allowed adhesion and proliferation of HEK293T cells to occur in both indirect and direct contact cell culture methods by Alamar Blue assay.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available