4.6 Review

Arcobacter species in milk contamination: a prevalence-based systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jambio/lxac037

Keywords

food safety; dairy; infection; microbial contamination; detection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess the occurrence of pathogenic Arcobacter species in 2945 milk samples and found that the global prevalence of Arcobacter genus in milk was 12%, with Arcobacter butzleri being the most prevalent. The prevalence of Arcobacter in milk was 13%, 10%, and 9% in Europe, South America, and Asia, respectively.
Aims Milk is consumed raw or minimally processed and plays a role in the dissemination of pathogens of public health concerns. The present investigation is aimed at assessing the occurrence of pathogenic Arcobacter species in 2945 milk samples. Methods and Results Arcobacter data systematically retrieved from five repositories until 20 February 2022 according to PRISMA principles were logit transformed and fitted using a generalized linear mixed-effects model. The between-study heterogeneity was estimated as I-2-value. Leave-one-out cross-validation and funnel plot with Egger's tests were used to assess the hardiness and bias in the model. The global prevalence of Arcobacter genus in the milk was 12% [95% confidence interval (CI): 7-19%; I-2 = 87.3%, 95% CI: 83.0-90.6%] and no publication bias observed (Egger's test: P = 0.112). Arcobacter genus prevalence in milk was 13% (95% CI: 5-30%), 10% (95% CI: 1-46%), and 9% (95% CI: 4-19%) in Europe, South America, and Asia, respectively. Arcobacter butzleri was the most prevalent [8% (95% CI: 4-13%)], followed by A. cryaerophilus [0.6% (95% CI: 0.2-33.2%)] and A. skirrowii [0.19% (95% CI: 0.03-1.2%)]. Also, species-specific prevalence of A. butzleri, A. cryaerophilus, and A. skirrowii varied continentally, but the test for species-specific/continental differences was not significantly different (P > 0.5).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available