4.4 Review

Efficacy and safety of oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
Volume 308, Issue 4, Pages 1047-1056

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06862-0

Keywords

Endometriosis; Pain; Oral GnRH antagonists; Efficiency; Safety

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this network meta-analysis (NMA) is to comprehensively analyze the evidence of oral GnRH antagonists in the treatment of moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. Through literature searching, eligible studies published before April 2022 were included. Elagolix 400 mg and ASP1707 15 mg were found to be most effective in reducing pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia. Overall, oral GnRH antagonists were effective in treating endometriosis-associated pain.
PurposeThe aim of this NMA is to comprehensively analyze evidence of oral GnRH antagonist in the treatment of moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain.MethodsLiterature searching was performed to select eligible studies published prior to April 2022 in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science. Randomized controlled trials involving patients who suffered from moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain and treated with oral nonpeptide GnRH antagonists or placebo were included.ResultsElagolix 400 mg and ASP1707 15 mg were most efficient in reducing pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. Relugolix 40 mg was best in reducing the analgesics use. The rates of any TEAEs and TEAEs-related discontinuation were highest in relugolix 40 mg and elagolix 250 mg, respectively, while rates of hot flush and headache were highest in relugolix 40 mg and elagolix 150 mg. Significantly decreased spinal BMD was observed in elagolix 250 mg.ConclusionOral GnRH antagonists were effective in endometriosis-associated pain in 12w, and most of the efficiency and safety outcomes were expressed in a dose-dependent manner, but linzagolix 75 mg was an exception.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available