4.5 Article

Comparative genomic study of the Penicillium genus elucidates a diverse pangenome and 15 lateral gene transfer events

Journal

IMA FUNGUS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s43008-023-00108-7

Keywords

Long read sequencing; MinION; Filamentous fungi; Penicillium; Phylogenetics; Pangenome; Lateral gene transfer; Mycotoxins

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, researchers sequenced 93 Penicillium isolates and established a species phylogeny and pangenome. They found that approximately half of the genes are shared among 98 or more isolates. They also discovered 15 lateral gene transfer events that have played a role in the evolution and adaptation of these fungi. This comprehensive characterization of the Penicillium genus surpasses single-reference genomes and captures the genetic variation.
The Penicillia are known to produce a wide range natural products-some with devastating outcome for the agricultural industry and others with unexploited potential in different applications. However, a large-scale overview of the biosynthetic potential of different species has been lacking. In this study, we sequenced 93 Penicillium isolates and, together with eleven published genomes that hold similar assembly characteristics, we established a species phylogeny as well as defining a Penicillium pangenome. A total of 5612 genes were shared between >= 98 isolates corresponding to approximately half of the average number of genes a Penicillium genome holds. We further identified 15 lateral gene transfer events that have occurred in this collection of Penicillium isolates, which might have played an important role, such as niche adaption, in the evolution of these fungi. The comprehensive characterization of the genomic diversity in the Penicillium genus supersedes single-reference genomes, which do not necessarily capture the entire genetic variation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available