4.2 Article

Single Surgeon's Experience in Repair of Median Cleft Lip: A Case Series of 5 Median Craniofacial Dysplasia Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 318-321

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008929

Keywords

Cheiloplasty; median cleft lip; median craniofacial dysplasia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Median craniofacial dysplasia is a rare congenital anomaly with varying severity. A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent repair for upper lip median cleft. Out of the five cases, two had a median notch in the vermilion, two had an incomplete median cleft lip, and one had a complete absence of columella, prolabium, and premaxilla. Different surgical corrections were performed for each case, including excision, straight-line repair, and reconstruction with flaps. Individual assessment is necessary for appropriate surgical treatment.
Median craniofacial dysplasia is a rare congenital anomaly with a broad spectrum of severity, which can be classified as hypoplasia, dysraphia, and hyperplasia, depending on the involved tissue amount. A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with median craniofacial dysplasia who underwent repair of the upper lip median cleft between January 2013 and February 2020. The median cleft of the upper lip was present in 5 cases. The average age at operation was 11 months. Two patients had a median notch in the vermilion, 2 patients had an incomplete median cleft lip, and 1 patient had a complete median cleft lip with the absence of columella, prolabium, and premaxilla. A variety of surgical correction was performed for each case, including simple rhombus-shaped excision, modified version of straight-line repair, and columella reconstruction using an intranasal dorsal flap and bilateral cleft margin flaps. Each case needs to be carefully assessed with individualization for appropriate surgical treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available