3.8 Article

Patients' perspectives on a patient-oriented electronic decision support tool to reduce overuse of proton pump inhibitors (arriba-PPI): a qualitative study in primary care

Journal

BMC PRIMARY CARE
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-01991-0

Keywords

Arriba-PPI; Proton pump inhibitors; Shared decision-making; Qualitative interviews; General practice; Primary care; Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients' perspectives and experiences with a consultation involving the arriba-PPI tool were evaluated in a German multicenter study. The study found that most patients did not recall the visual features of the tool, but valued a trustful relationship with their general practitioner and comprehensive, individualized counseling.
BackgroundTo evaluate patients' perspectives and their experiences with a consultation involving a computer-assisted and patient-centered discontinuation strategy (arriba-PPI tool) as part of a German multicenter study on reducing the prescription of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).MethodsQualitative in-depth telephone interviews on proton pump inhibitors with patients who had received an arriba-PPI tool-based counseling by their general practitioner (GP). A random sample of 30 patients was taken from study participants. Interviews were conducted in 2020 and analyzed using a thematic qualitative text analysis.ResultsAlthough this was meant to be the key to shared decision making with regard to PPI reduction, study participants mostly did not recall the visual features of the tool. However, a few patients remembered them very clearly. Above all, patients appreciated a trustful relationship with the GP as well as comprehensive, individualized counseling.ConclusionApplication of the arriba-PPI tool can support the decision process but can also hinder the consultation process if the tool is not properly embedded in the consultation. GPs using the arriba-PPI tool to support the shared decision-making process should consider the patients' and their own expectations on the benefit of the visual representation of the tool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available