4.2 Article

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Prediction of Effluent Phosphorus in a Full-Scale Wastewater Treatment Plant with Missing Phosphorus Input and Removal Data

Journal

ACS ES&T WATER
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.2c00517

Keywords

machine learning; deep learning; anomaly alarm; correlation analysis; phosphorus removal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized machine learning and deep learning models to predict effluent phosphorus concentration and proposed an anomaly alarm design to minimize the chance of exceeding the discharge permit based on incomplete data sets.
Although artificial intelligence (AI) such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) has been recognized as an emerging and promising tool, its application becomes challenging with incomplete data collection. Herein, in the absence of the influent phosphorus load and chemical dosage data for phosphorus removal, we employed ML/DL models to predict effluent phosphorus using nineyear data from a small-scale wastewater treatment plant. Attempts were made to select essential model input features from 42 variables by using Pearson correlation analysis to reveal internal correlations among variables. First, five ML regression models were used to predict the effluent phosphorus load, and a maximum coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.637 was achieved with the support vector machine model. Then, the DL model named long short-term memory could predict phosphorus load in one-day advance with an R2 value of 0.496. Finally, on the basis of the historical data, an anomaly alarm design was proposed to minimize the chance of exceeding the discharge permit and achieved a maximum accuracy of 79.7% to predict the phosphorus concentration after comparing seven ML classification models. This study provides an example of applying AI for process improvement and potential cost reduction with incomplete data sets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available