4.2 Article

Knee Diameter and Cross-Sectional Area as Biomarkers for Cartilage Knee Degeneration on Magnetic Resonance Images

Journal

MEDICINA-LITHUANIA
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59010027

Keywords

Outerbridge; chondromalacia; aging; body mass index; degeneration; magnetic resonance imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate demographic and radiologic parameters as surrogate biomarkers for predicting osteoarthritis (OA). The results revealed that age is the best predictor of severe knee cartilage degeneration, and knee diameters and cross-sectional area also correlate with the extent of cartilage lesions.
Background and Objectives: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a degenerative disorder characterized by damage to the joint cartilage, pain, swelling, and walking disability. The purpose of this study was to assess whether demographic and radiologic parameters (knee diameters and knee cross-sectional area from magnetic resonance (MR) images) could be used as surrogate biomarkers for the prediction of OA. Materials and Methods: The knee diameters and cross-sectional areas of 481 patients were measured on knee MR images, and the corresponding demographic parameters were extracted from the patients' clinical records. The images were graded based on the modified Outerbridge arthroscopic classification that was used as ground truth. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed on the collected data. Results: ROC analysis established that age was the most accurate predictor of severe knee cartilage degeneration (corresponding to Outerbridge grades 3 and 4) with an area under the curve (AUC) of the specificity-sensitivity plot of 0.865 +/- 0.02. An age over 41 years was associated with a sensitivity and specificity for severe degeneration of 82.8% (CI: 77.5-87.3%), and 76.4% (CI: 70.4-81.6%), respectively. The second-best degeneration predictor was the normalized knee cross-sectional area, with an AUC of 0.767 +/- 0.04), followed by BMI (AUC = 0.739 +/- 0.02), and normalized knee maximal diameter (AUC = 0.724 +/- 0.05), meaning that knee degeneration increases with increasing knee diameter. Conclusions: Age is the best predictor of knee damage progression in OA and can be used as surrogate marker for knee degeneration. Knee diameters and cross-sectional area also correlate with the extent of cartilage lesions. Though less-accurate predictors of damage progression than age, they have predictive value and are therefore easily available surrogate markers of OA that can be used also by general practitioners and orthopedic surgeons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available