4.4 Article

Guidance for selecting base temperatures when using degree-days in fish growth analyses

Journal

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2022-01971

Keywords

thermal time; standardization; bioenergetics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Degree-days (DD) are a useful metric for describing thermal scope in fish growth and physiology. However, there is a lack of guidance on calculating DD for specific fish species due to unknown base temperature values (T0). In this study, we estimated T0 for 82 fish species using empirical growth data and bioenergetics models. We found that T0 varied among and within species, depending on thermal guilds, life stages, and choice of air or water temperature data. Our findings provide guidance for calculating DD in fish science for different species and scenarios.
Degree-days (DD) are a useful metric for describing the thermal scope for fish growth and other physiological processes, but there is a lack of advice about how to calculate DD for a given fish species. In particular, appropriate values for the base temperature for growth (T0) are unknown for most fish species. Previous work showed that inappropriate T0 values can bias growth rate estimates and lead to erroneous conclusions when comparing growth among populations. It is therefore critical to use biologically relevant T0 values when calculating DD. We used two approaches that leverage empirical growth data and bioenergetics models to estimate T0 for 82 fish species. We found that T0 varied among species and across thermal guilds, with coldwater species having relatively low T0 values and warmwater species having higher T0 values. In addition, T0 varied across life stages and depended on whether one selected air or water temperature data to calculate DD. We provide guidance for calculating DD in fish science for many species and scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available