4.6 Article

Stable perovskite solar cells with 22% efficiency enabled by inhibiting migration/loss of iodide ions

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages 6955-6962

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp04422f

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Iodide ions in perovskite films tend to migrate, leading to phase segregation and degradation. In this study, polyetheramine (PEA) was introduced into the perovskite films to inhibit iodide migration and loss, resulting in improved efficiency of perovskite solar cells. The PEA-treated perovskite films showed minimal iodide loss even under long-term UV illumination and had a lower trap density compared to pristine films.
Iodide ions (I- and I-3(-)) in perovskites tend to migrate resulting in phase segregation and degradation of perovskite films and devices under illumination or operation conditions. In order to overcome this intrinsic difficulty, passivation and additive strategies have been developed in many studies. In this work, we introduced polyetheramine (PEA) into perovskite films to inhibit the migration and loss of iodides and suppress defects related to these migrated ions. The perovskite films with PEA barely suffered iodide loss even under long-term ultraviolet (UV) illumination and possessed a lower trap density than that of the pristine films before and after aging under UV illumination. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations revealed that PEA can form strong interactions with iodides and Pb2+ in perovskites via Pb=O and H-I bonds, and the iodide ions (I- and I-3(-)) could be locked firmly by PEA, preventing them from migra-tion or loss. Using this method, the efficiency of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) can be improved from 19.71% (without PEA) to 22.02% (with PEA). After 200 h of maximum power point (MPP) tracking, the efficiency of PSCs with PEA remained 89% of its initial value and that of PSCs without PEA fully degraded.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available