4.6 Article

Growth of High-Purity and High-Quality Turbostratic Graphene with Different Interlayer Spacings

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 4010-4018

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c068344010ACS

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the growth of high-purity and high-quality turbostratic graphene with different interlayer spacings by calcining ferric chloride and sucrose at 1000 degrees C under an argon atmosphere. The obtained turbostratic graphene contains two different interlayer spacings: 3.435 and 3.55 & Aring;. The two different interlayer spacings of turbostratic graphene are the result of different cooling rates at higher and lower temperatures.
Turbostratic graphene is a multilayer graphene, which has exotic electrical properties similar to those of monolayer graphene due to the low interlayer interaction. Additionally, the stacking structure of the turbostratic multilayer graphene can decrease the effect of attachment of charge impurities and surface roughness. This paper explores the growth of high-purity and high -quality turbostratic graphene with different interlayer spacings by calcining ferric chloride and sucrose at 1000 degrees C for 1 h under an argon atmosphere. X-ray diffraction patterns and Raman results imply that the turbostratic graphene contains two different interlayer spacings: 3.435 and 3.55 & Aring;. The 3.55 & Aring; turbostratic graphene is on top of the 3.435 & Aring; turbostratic graphene, and there is an AB stacking pattern between the topmost graphene layer of 3.435 & Aring; turbostratic graphene and the first graphene layer of the 3.55 & Aring; turbostratic graphene, with an interlayer spacing of 3.35 & Aring;. The two different interlayer spacings of turbostratic graphene arise from different cooling rates between the higher temperature ranges (> 700 degrees C) and lower temperatures (< 700 degrees C).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available