4.6 Article

Ferroelectric Electroresistance after a Breakdown in Epitaxial Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 Tunnel Junctions

Journal

ACS APPLIED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaelm.2c01186

Keywords

ferroelectric; ferroelectric hafnium oxide; epitaxial HfO2; ferroelectric tunnel junction; resistive switching

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent discovery of ferroelectricity in doped HfO2 has opened possibilities for the development of memristors based on ferroelectric switching. In this study, ferroelectricity and significant electro-resistance were observed in Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 tunnel junctions grown on Si. After a soft breakdown, where the resistance decreased by five orders of magnitude, ferroelectricity and electroresistance were still observed.
The recent discovery of ferroelectricity in doped HfO2 has opened perspectives on the development of memristors based on ferroelectric switching, including ferroelectric tunnel junctions. In these devices, conductive channels are formed in a similar manner to junctions based on nonferroelectric oxides. The formation of the conductive channels does not preclude the presence of ferroelectric switching, but little is known about the device ferroelectric properties after conduction path formation or their impact on the electric modulation of the resistance state. Here, we show that ferroelectricity and related sizable electro-resistance are observed in pristine 4.6 nm epitaxial Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 (HZO) tunnel junctions grown on Si. After a soft breakdown induced by the application of suitable voltage, the resistance decreases by about five orders of magnitude, but signatures of ferroelectricity and electroresistance are still observed. Impedance spectroscopy allows us to conclude that the effective ferroelectric device area after the breakdown is reduced, most likely by the formation of conducting paths at the edge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available