Use of imaging modalities for decision-making in inflammatory bowel disease

Cross-sectional magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and intestinal ultrasonography (IUS) provide valuable and noninvasive information to accurately assess disease activity, severity, and extent; detect complications; and monitor the response to treatment, as well as predict the postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease and a negative disease course. Therefore, both imaging modalities are emerging as pivotal diagnostic tools to achieve the emerging therapeutic target of transmural healing associated with better disease outcomes. Despite its numerous potential advantages over endoscopy and even MRE and its good availability, IUS is still widely underused to monitor and manage inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and help in making clinical decisions in routine practice. This situation is clearly due to the absence of validated, reliable, and responsive indices, as well as the lack of trained gastroenterologists and radiologists, as IUS is a component of radiologist expertise in several countries but not yet integrated into the training program of gastroenterologists. However, there is an increasing body of evidence in the literature that IUS and MRE are both becoming essential imaging resources to help clinicians in making reliable decisions. Here, we discuss the up-to-date evidence about the usefulness and performance of cross-sectional imaging, focusing on the ability of bowel US and MRE to aid clinical decision-making for the optimal management and monitoring of IBD.

Automated summary

Cross-sectional magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and intestinal ultrasonography (IUS) are valuable and noninvasive imaging modalities for the assessment, monitoring, and prediction of disease activity and outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. However, the underutilization of IUS in clinical practice is due to the lack of validated indices and trained gastroenterologists and radiologists. Nevertheless, the increasing evidence highlights the importance of both IUS and MRE in aiding clinical decision-making.