4.0 Article

Tebentafusp: a novel drug for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma

Journal

DRUGS OF TODAY
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages 179-193

Publisher

PROUS SCIENCE, SAU-THOMSON REUTERS
DOI: 10.1358/dot.2023.59.3.3542417

Keywords

Tebentafusp; Metastatic uveal melanoma; Immune-mobilizing monoclonal T-cell receptors against cancer (ImmTACs); IMCgp100; HLA-A*0201

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On January 25, 2022, the FDA approved tebentafusp for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). Tebentafusp targets a specific HLA-A*02:01/gp100 complex, activating T cells to induce tumor cell death. Clinical trials have shown positive overall survival and response rates, as well as manageable adverse events. The approval of tebentafusp is groundbreaking due to the limited efficacy of current treatments for mUM.
On January 25, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administ-ration (FDA) approved the use of tebentafusp, a bispecific glycoprotein 100 (gp100) peptide-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-directed CD3 T-cell activator, for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). Pharmacodynamic data indicate that tebentafusp targets a specific HLA-A*02:01/gp100 complex, activating both CD4+/CD8+ effector and memory T cells that induce tumor cell death. Tebentafusp is administered to patients via intravenous infusion daily or weekly, depending on the indication. Phase III trials have documented a 1-year overall survival of 73%, overall response rate of 9%, progression-free survival of 31% and disease control rate of 46%. Common adverse events reported are cytokine release syndrome, rash, pyrexia, pruritus, fatigue, nausea, chills, abdominal pain, edema, hypotension, dry skin, headache and vomiting. Compared to other types of melanomas, mUM presents with a distinct profile of genetic mutations, which phenotypically results in limited survival efficacy when using traditional melanoma treatments. The low current treatment efficacy for mUM, along-side a poor long-term prognosis and high mortality rates, gives precedence for the approval of tebenta-fusp to be groundbreaking in its clinical impact. This review will discuss the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile, and the clinical trials used to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tebentafusp.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available