4.7 Article

Rescue of Rare CFTR Trafficking Mutants Highlights a Structural Location-Dependent Pattern for Correction

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043211

Keywords

Cystic Fibrosis; CFTR; correctors; protein stability; protein trafficking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease caused by mutations in the gene encoding the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) channel. The approval of modulators that act on mutant CFTR protein, correcting its molecular defect and thus alleviating the burden of the disease, revolutionized the field of CF. However, these drugs do not apply to all patients with CF, especially those with rare mutations. In this study, the impact of rare mutations on CFTR expression, processing, and response to modulators was evaluated, and it was found that mutations in different locations have different effects.
Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease caused by mutations in the gene encoding the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) channel. Currently, more than 2100 variants have been identified in the gene, with a large number being very rare. The approval of modulators that act on mutant CFTR protein, correcting its molecular defect and thus alleviating the burden of the disease, revolutionized the field of CF. However, these drugs do not apply to all patients with CF, especially those with rare mutations-for which there is a lack of knowledge on the molecular mechanisms of the disease and the response to modulators. In this work, we evaluated the impact of several rare putative class II mutations on the expression, processing, and response of CFTR to modulators. Novel cell models consisting of bronchial epithelial cell lines expressing CFTR with 14 rare variants were created. The variants studied are localized at Transmembrane Domain 1 (TMD1) or very close to the signature motif of Nucleotide Binding Domain 1 (NBD1). Our data show that all mutations analyzed significantly decrease CFTR processing and while TMD1 mutations respond to modulators, those localized in NBD1 do not. Molecular modeling calculations confirm that the mutations in NBD1 induce greater destabilization of CFTR structure than those in TMD1. Furthermore, the structural proximity of TMD1 mutants to the reported binding site of CFTR modulators such as VX-809 and VX-661, make them more efficient in stabilizing the CFTR mutants analyzed. Overall, our data suggest a pattern for mutation location and impact in response to modulators that correlates with the global effect of the mutations on CFTR structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available