4.7 Article

An l-proline-modified chiral porous hyper-crosslinked l-phenylalanine dipeptide-increased reaction rate and selectivity in asymmetric catalysis

Journal

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages 1124-1134

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3py00045a

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An l-phenylalanine dipeptide monomer was cross-linked to form a chiral porous polymer skeleton, which was then modified with l-proline to produce a catalyst with a higher specific surface area. The catalyst exhibited improved catalytic efficiency and selectivity in asymmetric Michael addition and Mannich reactions. The recyclable and cost-effective nature of the catalyst makes it an effective strategy for preparing high-performance asymmetric catalysts.
An l-phenylalanine dipeptide (l-Phe-l-Phe-OMe) monomer was cross-linked to form a heterogeneous chiral porous polymer skeleton, HCP(l-Phe-l-Phe-OMe), which was then modified with l-proline (l-Pro) to produce an HCP(l-Pro-l-Phe-l-Phe-OMe) catalyst with a higher specific surface area of 261.68 m(2) g(-1). Asymmetric Michael addition and Mannich reactions were successfully catalyzed using HCP(l-Pro-l-Phe-l-Phe-OMe); compared to the case of l-Pro-l-Phe-l-Phe-OMe, the reaction time for the Michael reaction of cyclohexanone with trans-beta-nitrostyrene was shortened from 7 d to 4 d, and the enantiomeric excess (ee) value increased from 71% to 97%. Such significant improvements were also observed in asymmetric Mannich reactions. In addition, the optimum conditions for catalytic reactions are discussed with time, solvent and catalyst amount as variables, and the applicability of the catalyst was investigated using the substrate structure. The catalyst is recyclable via simple filtration and it exhibits good recycling performance. Preparing high-performance asymmetric catalysts using affordable amino acids is thus an effective strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available