4.5 Article

Shared stressful experiences affect social proximity in Merino sheep

Journal

BIOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0396

Keywords

shared experience; real-time kinematic (RTK) devices; social bonds; familiar

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the influence of shared stressful experiences on relationship bonding in animals, focusing on Merino ewes. The results show that sheep prefer to be closest to familiar individuals, but they also develop a preference for individuals with whom they shared a stressful experience. These findings contribute to our understanding of how unfamiliar animals bond and perceive conspecifics in stress-inducing situations.
While it is well established that humans develop stronger relationship bonds when they share stressful experiences, there is little known on how shared stressful experiences may influence relationship bonding in animals. Here, we present a study looking at social proximity between individuals in small groups of Merino ewes following a shared stressful experience compared with control sheep that were not exposed to stress. Some sheep were familiar to each other. Analyses of social proximity using real-time-kinematic Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) on-animal devices showed sheep preferred to be closest to familiar individuals, but across the study duration they also developed a preference for the individuals they shared the stressful experience with, relative to their proximity to control individuals. These results contribute to limited research on what factors may instigate the development of bonds between unfamiliar sheep. Between-individual bonds may develop as a means of socially mediated stress buffering. Social bonding following a shared stressful experience aligns with human social relationships and increases our understanding of how animals perceive their conspecifics in relation to stressful environmental change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available