4.7 Article

Species-Specific Response of Corals to Imbalanced Ratios of Inorganic Nutrients

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043119

Keywords

DIN; DIP; octocoral; scleractinian; elemental composition; nutrient uptake

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study found that the hard coral Turbinaria reniformis and the soft coral Sarcophyton glaucum have different physiological responses to different nitrogen to phosphorus ratios. Hard corals are more sensitive to the ratio, while soft corals only uptake when nitrogen and phosphorus are present simultaneously. This study helps predict how different coral species will respond to nitrogen to phosphorus ratios under eutrophic conditions.
Dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP) is a limiting nutrient in the physiology of scleractinian corals. Anthropogenic addition of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) to coastal reefs increases the seawater DIN:DIP ratio and further increases P limitation, which is detrimental to coral health. The effects of imbalanced DIN:DIP ratios on coral physiology require further investigation in coral species other than the most studied branching corals. Here we investigated the nutrient uptake rates, elemental tissue composition and physiology of a foliose stony coral, Turbinaria reniformis, and a soft coral, Sarcophyton glaucum, exposed to four different DIN: DIP ratios (0.5:0.2, 0.5:1, 3:0.2, 3:1). The results show that T. reniformis had high uptake rates of DIN and DIP, proportional to the seawater nutrient concentrations. DIN enrichment alone led to an increase in tissue N content, shifting the tissue N:P ratio towards P limitation. However, S. glaucum had 5 times lower uptake rates and only took up DIN when the seawater was simultaneously enriched with DIP. This double uptake of N and P did not alter tissue stoichiometry. This study allows us to better understand the susceptibility of corals to changes in the DIN:DIP ratio and predict how coral species will respond under eutrophic conditions in the reef.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available