4.6 Article

Counter-Rotating Hoop Stabilizer and SVR Control for Two-Wheels Vehicle Applications

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages 14436-14447

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3243739

Keywords

INDEX TERMS Customizable stabilizer system; IMU sensor; closed-loop control; support vector machine; machine learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this research, a small-scale, customizable, two-wheels design is proposed for the automatic correction of destabilization. The design uses two counter-rotating wheels controlled by an IMU sensor and an ARDUINO Uno Rev3 microcontroller. The proposed architecture achieved 100% correction accuracy in a +/- 21 degrees range, but showed decreased performance for angles up to +/- 30 degrees. It also demonstrated the capability to predict correct PWM values within an average intervention time of 1.28s under random acceleration.
The matter of stabilization has always attracted attention from both academia and industry. In the case of bikes, kickboards, and scooters, simple stabilizer designs have been explored but are rarely applied in commercial products. In this research, a small-scale, customizable, two-wheels design, is proposed and connected to a retroactive closed-loop control unit for the automatic correction of the destabilization during the motion. The design is based on two counter-rotating wheels, spun into motion at the beginning of the ride and controlled by an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensor. The two DC motors controlling the spinning of the balancing wheels are adjusted by means of Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) input in the 0 similar to 255 PWM range. The control is based on an ARDUINO Uno Rev3 microcontroller and on a Support Vector Regression (SVR) model coupled with a Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel. If an angular deviation outside the user-defined range is detected by the IMU sensor, the trained SVR-RBF model predicts the required PWM value to reestablish equilibrium and sends the signals to one or both DC motors. The proposed architecture was trained and validated in a +/- 21 degrees range, resulting in a 100% correction accuracy up to a +/- 23 degrees range, whereas, for greater angles up to +/- 30 degrees , a drop in performances was observed. In addition to that, when a random acceleration in the +/- 6 degrees/s(2) range was applied, the proposed design showed a remarkable capability of predicting the correct PWM values, for both reaction wheels, capable of reestablishing equilibrium in the system within an average intervention time equal to 1.28s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available