4.3 Article

Evaluation of Thar Desert bacterial lipases for catalytic efficiencies and biodiesel production potentials

Journal

BIOLOGIA
Volume 78, Issue 4, Pages 1187-1197

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11756-023-01340-7

Keywords

Lipase; Screening; Characterization; Catalytic efficiency; Biodiesel; Thar Desert

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present work screened thermotolerant bacteria from Thar Desert environmental samples for lipase activity and catalytic efficiencies. The selected lipases showed thermos-alkaliphilic properties and efficiently synthesized biodiesel from waste cooking oils. These lipases have potential applications in biodiesel production, synthesis of esters, and remediation of environmental pollutants.
The present work describes the screening of thermotolerant bacteria isolated from Thar Desert environmental samples for lipase activity and their catalytic efficiencies, such as tolerance to extreme pHs, temperatures, and organic solvents, and efficiency to synthesize biodiesel from waste cooking oils. The selected lipases were thermos-alkaliphilic in nature showing good activity at higher temperatures and in the alkaline pH range with optimal activity at 45 degrees C and pH 8 or 9. The lipases efficiently converted oils to biodiesel (fatty acid methyl ester), giving up to 78% conversion under specific reaction conditions. The enzyme (lipase) mediated biodiesel production will soon offer an eco-friendly and sustainable energy source for automobiles and industrial applications. The thermos-alkaliphilic properties of these lipases along with their efficiency to produce fatty acid methyl ester from waste cooking oil and methanol as well as other prospective applications, make them potential candidates for biodiesel production and other prospective applications such as the synthesis of flavor and fragrance esters and remediation of various environmental pollutants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available