4.3 Article

Effect of implant placement depth on bone remodeling on implant-supported single zirconia abutment crown: A 3D finite element study

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages 278-287

Publisher

JAPAN PROSTHODONTIC SOC
DOI: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00054

Keywords

Subcrestal placement; Bone remodeling; Dental implant; Time-dependent finite element analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of subcrestal implant placement depth on bone remodeling using time-dependent finite element analysis (FEA) with a bone-remodeling algorithm. The study found that deeper implant placement can increase bone density, but it also increases the maximum von Mises stress and overloading elements.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of subcrestal implant placement depth on bone remodeling using time-dependent finite element analysis (FEA) with a bone-remodeling algorithm over 12 months.Methods: Seven models of different subcrestal implant placement depths (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 mm) were analyzed using FEA to evaluate the biomechanical responses in the bone and implant, including von Mises equivalent stress, strain energy density (SED), and overloading elements. SED was used as a mechanical stimulus to simulate cortical and cancellous bone remodeling over the first 12 months after final prosthesis delivery.Results: The highest increase in cortical bone density was observed at Depth 1.5, whereas the lowest increase was ob-served at Depth 3.0. In contrast, the highest increase in bone density was observed at Depth 3.0 in the cancellous bone, whereas the lowest increase was observed at Depth 0. The highest peak von Mises stress in the cortical bone occurred at Depth 2.5 (107.24 MPa), while that in the cancellous bone was at Depth 2.5 (34.55 MPa). Notably, the maximum von Mises stress values in the cancellous bone exceeded the natural limit of the bony material, as indicated by the overloading elements observed at the depths of 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 mm.Conclusion: Greater bone density apposition is observed with deeper implant placement. An implant depth of more than 1.5 mm exhibited a higher maximum von Mises stress and greater overloading elements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available