4.5 Article

Mapping the Literature on Academic Publishing: A Bibliometric Analysis on WOS

Journal

SAGE OPEN
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/21582440231158562

Keywords

academic publishing; bibliometrics; knowledge mapping; web of science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using bibliometric software such as CiteSpace and VOSviewer, this study conducted a dynamic visual systematic review of academic publishing literature from 1970 to 2020, revealing internal structures and hidden inferences. The study analyzed diversified disciplines, top-ranked journals, widely occurring topics, cited articles, productive scholars, and contributing institutions and countries. Co-citation, co-occurrence, cluster detection, and strong citation burstness were used to show the intellectual base, evolutionary stages, and dynamics of transitions in academic publishing.
With the data from the Web of Science Core Collection-Citation database for the period (1970-2020), we conducted a dynamic visual systematic review of the literature on academic publishing with the help of bibliometric software, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer. The main purpose is to reveal the internal structures and hidden inferences, including the diversified discipline, top-ranked journals, most widely occurring topics, most cited and leading articles, highly productive and outstanding scholars, and most contributing institutions and countries. The co-citation, co-occurrence, cluster detection, and strong citation burstness were employed to show the intellectual base, evolutionary stages, and dynamics of transitions of academic publishing. The study defines the whole profile of international academic publishing, presenting its diachronic evolution, identifying research front, detecting emerging trends and abrupt changes. It expands the previous paradigm that ignored the large data corpus, aiming to provide certain reference value for future research of academic publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available