4.8 Article

Defect MoS Misidentified as MoS2 in Monolayer MoS2 by Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy: A First-Principles Prediction

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 1840-1847

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c000321840

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Defect types in layered semiconductors can be identified by matching STEM images with first-principles simulations. MoS2 antisite is dominant in PVD-grown MoS2 monolayer, and MoS may be mistaken as MoS2 due to similar structural distortion and ionization. Previous studies have overlooked the ionization and structural distortion of MoS. Considering defect ionization and associated structural distortion is necessary in STEM identification of defects in layered semiconductors.
The defect types in layered semiconductors can be identified by matching the scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images with the structures from first-principles simulations. In a PVD-grown MoS2 monolayer, the MoS2 antisite (one Mo replaces two S) is recognized as being dominant, because its calculated structure matches the distortive structure in STEM images. Therefore, MoS2 has received much attention in MoS2- related defect engineering. We reveal that MoS (one Mo replaces one S) may be mistaken for MoS2, because ionized MoS also has similar structural distortion and can easily be ionized under electron irradiation. Unfortunately, the radiation-induced ionization and associated structural distortion of MoS were overlooked in previous studies. Because the formation energy of MoS is much lower than that of MoS2, it is more likely to exist as the dominant defect in MoS2. Our results highlight the necessity of considering the defect ionization and associated structural distortion in STEM identification of defects in layered semiconductors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available