4.4 Article

Comparison of Pre-Descemet Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Endothelial Decompensation

Journal

CORNEA
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 292-297

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003042

Keywords

endothelial keratoplasty; DMEK; PDEK

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of pre-Descemet endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in cases of endothelial decompensation. The patients were followed up for 6 months after surgery and it was found that both surgeries had comparable visual and graft survival outcomes.
Purpose:The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of pre-Descemet endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in cases of endothelial decompensation.Methods:This was a prospective, randomized, interventional study conducted at a tertiary eye hospital in North India. Thirty eyes of 28 patients with corneal decompensation were randomly subjected to PDEK (n = 15 eyes) and DMEK (n = 15 eyes). Preoperative demographic details, surgical indications, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, anterior and posterior segment details, intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell count, and corneal aberrometry tracing on wavefront analysis were recorded. Patients were followed up for 6 months postsurgery. Visual and graft survival outcomes were assessed.Results:Intraoperatively, a surgeon reported better ease of preparation and intracameral handling with PDEK grafts. Both groups showed comparable improvement in visual acuity, contrast, and high-order aberrations. A decrease in central corneal thickness was significantly higher in DMEK (196 +/- 26 vs. 140 +/- 14 mu m) patients. DMEK grafts were significantly thinner than PDEK grafts at the 6-month follow-up (16 +/- 2.17 vs. 27.2 +/- 1.93 mu m). Endothelial cell loss (35% in DMEK vs. 33.4% in PDEK, P = 0.48) and rise of intraocular pressure (from 15.33 +/- 2.85 mm Hg to 15.53 +/- 2.2 mm Hg in the DMEK group vs. from 14.6 +/- 1.99 mm Hg to 16.2 +/- 1.43 mm Hg in the PDEK group) were comparable. Rebubbling rates were higher in the DMEK group (3/15, 20%) compared with the PDEK group (1/15, 6.66%; P = 0.165).Conclusions:DMEK and PDEK were comparable for both quantitative and qualitative visual outcomes and anatomically for graft survival at the 6-month follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available