4.8 Article

Tailoring acidic microenvironments for carbon-efficient CO2 electrolysis over a Ni-N-C catalyst in a membrane electrode assembly electrolyzer

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 1502-1510

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ee03482d

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A carbon-efficient CO2 electrolysis strategy using a zero-gap acidic membrane electrode assembly electrolyzer is proposed to convert CO2 into valuable fuels and chemicals. The microenvironments of a Ni-N-C catalyst are optimized by adjusting the anolyte composition and CO2 pressure. Under optimal conditions, a CO faradaic efficiency of 95% and a CO production rate of 13 mL min(-1) are achieved. This strategy shows higher energy efficiency and reduced carbon loss compared to alkaline CO2 electrolysis.
CO2 electrolysis converting CO2 into valuable fuels and chemicals powered by renewable electricity shows great promise for practical applications. However, it suffers from low energy efficiency and carbon efficiency due to severe carbon loss in alkaline and neutral electrolytes. Here we present a carbon-efficient CO2 electrolysis strategy using a zero-gap acidic membrane electrode assembly electrolyzer. The microenvironments of a Ni-N-C catalyst (such as local concentrations of H+/K+ and CO2) are turned by optimizing the anolyte composition (pH, K+) and input CO2 pressure. Under optimal conditions, acidic CO2 electrolysis over the Ni-N-C catalyst achieves a CO faradaic efficiency of 95% at a total current density of 500 mA cm(-2), corresponding to a CO production rate as high as 13 mL min(-1). An energy efficiency of 45% for CO production is obtained at pH 0.5 and the CO2 loss is reduced by 86% at 300 mA cm(-2), compared to alkaline CO2 electrolysis. Density functional theory calculations reveal that the co-existence of H+ and K+ plays a crucial role in stabilizing the initial *CO2 intermediate, resulting in enhanced CO formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available