4.8 Article

Selection criteria for electrical double layer structure regulators enabling stable Zn metal anodes

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 1721-1731

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ee00045a

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Regulating the structure of the electrical double layer (EDL) using electrolyte additives can enhance the stability of zinc (Zn) anodes, but there is a lack of general strategies for designing EDL regulators to improve Zn protection performance. Through screening 15 solvent additives, it is found that the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) capability of the EDL regulators plays a crucial role in controlling the cycling stability of Zn anodes. The SEI capability enables the formation of a uniform and dense SEI layer on the Zn surface, promoting dendrite-free Zn deposition and isolating the anode from the electrolyte.
Regulating the electrical double layer (EDL) structure via electrolyte additives is a promising strategy to improve the cycling stability of Zn anodes, but there are no general strategies that can be used to rationally design EDL regulators for upgrading the Zn protection performance. Herein, by screening 15 solvent additives as EDL regulators, we reveal that the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) capability of EDL regulators, instead of other parameters like the donor number, adsorption energy, and dielectric constant, predominately controls the cycling stability of Zn anodes. Specifically, the SEI capability of EDL regulators endows the Zn surface with a uniform and dense SEI layer, which physically isolates Zn anodes from electrolytes and induces dendrite-free Zn deposition. As a model electrolyte, 2M ZnSO4 solution with 0.5 vol% sulfolane enables Zn anodes to deliver high Zn plating/stripping reversibility under harsh test conditions. The compatibility of this designed electrolyte with V2O5 and MnO2 cathodes is also demonstrated at low N/P ratios of 5.5 and 3.2, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available