4.6 Article

Resolving Hall and dissipative viscosity ambiguities via boundary effects

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.075148

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the physical implications of the viscous redundancy in two-dimensional anisotropic fluids, where different components of the viscosity tensor have identical effects. We reintroduce the redundancy and provide microscopic examples to illustrate its reflection of a lack of microscopic information. We demonstrate that fluid flow in systems with a boundary can distinguish between otherwise redundant viscosity coefficients, specifically addressing the dispersion and damping of gravity-dominated surface waves.
We examine the physical implications of the viscous redundancy of two-dimensional anisotropic fluids, where different components of the viscosity tensor lead to identical effects in the bulk of a system [Rao and Bradlyn, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021005 (2020)]. We first reintroduce the redundancy, show how it reflects a lack of knowledge of microscopic information of a system, and give microscopic examples. Next, we show that fluid flow in systems with a boundary can distinguish between otherwise redundant viscosity coefficients. In particular, we show how the dispersion and damping of gravity-dominated surface waves can be used to resolve the redundancies between both dissipative and Hall viscosities, and discuss how these results apply to recent experiments in chiral active fluids with nonvanishing Hall viscosity. Our results highlight the importance of divergenceless, magnetizationlike contributions to the stress (which we dub contact terms). Finally, we apply our results to the hydrodynamics of quantum Hall fluids and show that the extra contribution to the action that renders the bulk Wen-Zee action gauge invariant in systems with a boundary can be reinterpreted in terms of the bulk viscous redundancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available