4.6 Article

A force field for bio-polymers in ionic liquids (BILFF) - part 2: cellulose in [EMIm][OAc]/water mixtures

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 8755-8766

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp05636d

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We extended our force field BILFF to cellulose, a bio-polymer. Our all-atom force field accurately reproduces the hydrogen bonds in cellulose, [EMIm](+), [OAc](-) and water mixtures, based on reference ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. By performing 50 individual AIMD simulations, we were able to optimize the force field parameters and achieve good agreement with microstructure and experimental results.
We present the extension of our force field BILFF (Bio-Polymers in Ionic Liquids Force Field) to the bio-polymer cellulose. We already published BILFF parameters for mixtures of ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([EMIm][OAc]) with water. Our all-atom force field focuses on a quantitative reproduction of the hydrogen bonds in the complex mixture of cellulose, [EMIm](+), [OAc](-) and water when compared to reference ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations. To enhance the sampling, 50 individual AIMD simulations starting from different initial configurations were performed for cellulose in solvent instead of one long simulation, and the resulting averages were used for force field optimization. All cellulose force field parameters were iteratively adjusted starting from the literature force field of W. Damm et al. We were able to obtain a very good agreement with respect to both the microstructure of the reference AIMD simulations and experimental results such as the system density (even at higher temperatures) and the crystal structure. Our new force field allows performing very long simulations of large systems containing cellulose solvated in (aqueous) [EMIm][OAc] with almost ab initio accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available